North Cyprus Property News | Striking Out | K5 v AB


DELETED BANK v Kulaksiz 5 – more dirty tricks to come?
Sunday, June 19, 2011 by Name & Address Supplied

Kibris Gazetesi printed an item about me, sent in allegedly by Akan Kursat via a fax which alleged that I was a delusional woman who had received £120,000 from a court award and thought I could also keep the villa. I have attached to this article my right of reply given to me by Kibris Gazetesi on the 7 August 2010. This makes clear that although the court had awarded me the sum of £120,000 in my Breach of Contract action against the builder Kulaksiz Construction Limited on the 6th November 2009, I had not received it then, I have not received it to this date.

I, in company with Bob French had had a meeting with Akan Kursat in his office together with our then Advocates on the 23rd July 2010. At that time I had informed Mr Kursat that I had not received the award. Indeed at that meeting it was agreed that all owners of Kulaksiz 5 villas would carry out surveys on their properties and send written reports to the Bank on their condition. There was on that date, no indication that the Bank would, just one week later, break into my secured villa, change the locks, isolate the electricity to cut if off and then on their escape, drive a car at speed at my partner. That reinforced my suspicions that I was dealing with duplicitous dangerous people. To then see the lies printed about me as fact was just too much. I had to insist on a right reply, the article you see here.

At the end of last year, there was another such written attack on me, this time in the form of a letter sent to Havadis. Fortunately a friend made me aware of this and again I was given the right of reply. This time the writer (who obviously used a false name as no trace could be found of him in either the telephone book or electoral records) stated as fact that I was a propagandist and that I owned two villas with pools in South Cyprus. This was clearly designed to alienate the Turkish Cypriot public against me. I did once live in the South and I did once own a villa there without a pool. I sold that villa in 1998 when I returned to the UK for a few years. On the 14th September 2005, I Contracted to buy the villa Deleted Bank Limited illegally repossessed by force on the 30th July 2010. Two legal opinion state this was a criminal offence yet I am the one who is threatened with arrest for even taking a photo of it. Now I have to swallow the ultimate indignity of seeing my villa being used as a weekend retreat by the Kader family. Who says crime does not pay?

Why then have I joined K5 in this further legal battle? I do not have faith in the system. I am no nearer receiving my court award and you only have to see what has happened to Geoff and Mary Day to understand my thought process. As of today, I am without a villa and without compensation. Eva McCluskey is in the same position, and contrary to an alleged claim by Deleted Bank, she is not dead. The other members of K5 are at least enjoying the legal route which compels Deleted Bank to issue Writs and follow the legal procedure set down to obtain vacant possession. It seems Eva and I will not be given our legal rights. The police have had written complaints in both mine and Eva’s case. My complaint was made at the time of the incident almost a year ago, the police never got back to me, although they always seem to be able to find me when Deleted Bank allegedly think I have overstepped the mark.”

Nothing much has changed since this article was written in June 2011. Nigel Watson jumped on the ***Deleted*** Bank bandwagon and accused Pauline Read of the same thing as Akan Kursat did in the above article, citing letters he had been shown when visiting ‘important people’ as a champion of victims which proved Pauline to be the deluded person the Bank say she is. He wrote his ‘Mrs Parrot’ ditty in NCF and then deleted it, then said Mrs Parrot was not Pauline Read, but of course, who could it possibly be if not Pauline Read? How strange that the circumstances should be identical to Pauline Read’s and yet until then no one had heard of a woman in exactly the same situation as Ms Read? Pull the other one with bells on, springs to mind… ding dong. Some champion.

Pauline Read is no nearer to receiving the £120,000 plus 4% interest than she was on the day she won the case on 9th November 2009, or the day the Enforcement Order was given on 1st October 2010. The strange fractions on the Enforcement document that suddenly took the place of actual property on the Injunction documents continue to baffle everyone who sees them. Her previous Advocate never explained this to Ms Read, or the reason for it. Nor did she ever chase the order, stating she was not allowed to; one has to wonder why? Being the prime cause of Ms Read finding herself in this mess, the Advocate took the easy way out and sacked Ms Read as a client. Duty of care, a joke?

The belief that she will never see a penny of the money on this order continues and this is the reason she is part of the Kulaksiz 5 litigation team.

The appearance on Tuesday 18th December 2012 at Girne District court will be for the Judge to decide on the request to ‘strike out’ some of the content in the defence document submitted by the Bank. If you wish to support the Kulaksiz 5, a start time of 8.30 am has been given, whether this will be the actual start time is not known.

If you care, be there.

Never give in, never give up

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Comments are closed.