Pauline’s Opinion | Is Pauline’s Opinion

Pauline's Opinion | Is Pauline's OpinionWITHOUT PREJUDICE

I wish to make it very clear that when I write on here, or on my fb page or group pages on the subject of my purchase of my villa at 5 Demokrasi Sokak, Karsiyaka on the development known as Kulaksiz 5, I am speaking for ME and only ME. The other litigants have their own spokesperson and he does not speak for me.

My opinions, are just that, MY opinions and can in no way be attributed to others.

I have been requested not to mention the above case on here or on social media. I will continue to express my opinions and my feelings in as much as it affects me.

I will continue to mention the fact that I did buy on the Kulaksiz 5 development and that I have not had access to my purchase since the 30th July 2010. Akfinans Bank Limited broke into it and took illegal possession of it. The bank spent tens of thousands of £’s sterling on my villa and have weekended in it for the last five years.

Although the police were made aware of this crime and a written statement was made to them, they refused to act other than to threaten to arrest me if I set foot in my garden.

I remain a litigant against he Bank. I intend to stay in the case until the end. I have spent too much to get this far so I will be in the case until a final verdict is given.

A date for the Appeal instigated by the Bank against the judgement given by Judge Talat Usar on the 4th December 2014 has now been received. The Appeal is set for the 12th October 2015 at Lefkosa High Court.

Pauline Read

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

14 comments to Pauline’s Opinion | Is Pauline’s Opinion

  • Polly Marples

    Well decision 4th December 2014
    Appeal date 12th October 2015

    Another 10 months of PAULINE’S life gone by.

  • fluter

    Soooooo looking forward to that date. Let’s hope it will not be another adjournment following tricky stuff on the part of you-know-who.

  • Polly Marples

    I am not sure how that works with the High Court.

  • fluter

    Maybe that is different? Perhaps, for instance, a High Court Judge would object to the non-attendance of one party in the action?

  • Polly Marples

    Well if you remember the lower court cancelled our case for non attendance when our advocate says he was told it had been postponed. Cost us another arm and a leg to get it reinstated. I have long since given up on expecting even handedness.

  • fluter

    Yes, I remain convinced that their action was deliberate.

  • Polly Marples

    Yes….but when Akan and the bank did not bother to turn up for one of the large Libel case appearances, with 7 defendants, who all turned up. Did the Judge cancel the case….did she heck as like.

    I get pilloried for saying that the Justice in TRNC is not even handed and examples like this prove me right.

  • cyprusishome

    Remember back to Geoff Day case, whenever the builder and his mob of liars never turned up what happened? Lay odds that if Geoff or his witnesses did not turn up the police would have been out in force to arrest them.

  • fluter

    No prejudice there then!

    Someone on another thread said that the legal system is not corrupt. Well, I find that difficult to accept.

    The Geoff Day case was a scandal. What about the liars? Did they get done for perjury? Uh-uh.

  • Polly Marples

    Rubbish. I will believe it is fair when I get back my house and compensation OR the money for my house and compensation.

    Was that one of them thar flying pigs that just flew over?

    No fluter, and I believe they are still fighting for their house, having won once, then had it cancelled in their absence. Geoff has all my sympathy, the other…well if she was on fire I would not pee on her to put it out….REMEMBER Laura.

  • Wallet and Gromit

    Have your legal vultures done anything about getting Mr Guner and close family removed from your property and the resulting title deed cancelled yet?
    If not why not?
    That was the judges instructions as I understood things?

  • fluter

    Yes Polly, Recaioglu waited until they were in UK then managed to go to court and have the judgement overturned without their knowledge.

    How is that not corruption within the legal system?

    That place will never change I’m afraid.

  • Polly Marples

    No WG….more interested in telling Pauline to stop calling herself a cash cow.

    fluter…..yes the inconsistency is staggering, one judge quite happy to overturn a case where the Petitioner is not present. Another happy to CANCEL a case where the Petitioner has falsely been told the case is adjounrned. Another happy to allow the Petitioner be a now show and just give a new date for the appearance.

    Note all to the advantage of Turkish Cypriots…no racism there then.

  • Polly Marples

    should be no show.