North Cyprus News | 2013 – Not a Good Year for Asil Nadir

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

North Cyprus News – 2013 was Not a Good Year for Asil Nadir

2013 was the year Mrs Nadir decided being married to Mr Nadir was no longer what she wanted. It seems Nur Nadir is looking for a £5m settlement, add that to the £5m Mr Nadir is reported to have paid to the British Government, it seems 2013 was an expensive year for Mr. Nadir. Of course it is widely reported that Mr Nadir has no money.

It is also interesting that Mr Nadir commanded a deal of attention in the House of Lords through his alleged friend Lord Maginnis of Drumglass

Written Answers — House of Lords: Asil Nadir (17 December 2013)

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass: To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they, or any of their agencies, are in possession of any documents relating to the 2012 trial of Asil Nadir which were not made available during that trial; and, if so, whether they will place copies of those documents in the Library of the House.

Written Answers — House of Lords: Asil Nadir (11 December 2013)

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass: To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether allegations that Asil Nadir had sought to bribe Mr Justice Tucker in the 1993 Polly Peck trial were investigated; if so, by whom; what was the outcome; and whether the matter was again raised in the 2012 trial.

Written Answers — House of Lords: Asil Nadir (28 November 2013)

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass: …on 24 June (WA 87), what were the financial implications for Serco Group plc as a result of the Field Monitoring Officer’s serious misconduct; whether a formal apology was issued to Mr Nadir as a consequence of the Field Monitoring Officer’s serious misconduct; and whether the Field Monitoring Officer received a severance package.

Oral Answers to Questions — Prime Minister: Engagements (20 November 2013)

Edward Miliband: …; he has a party chairman who operated a company under a false name and was investigated for fraud; he has taken millions from tax exiles and tax avoiders; his party has never paid back the money from Asil Nadir—and they are just the people I can talk about in this House. Did not the planning Minister have it right yesterday, when he said “the single biggest problem the…

New Clause 2 — Petitions of concern: Clause 1 — Donations (18 November 2013) See 1 other result from this debate

Stephen Pound: Asil Nadir.

Public Interest Immunity Certificates — Question (18 November 2013) See 1 other result from this debate

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass: My Lords, is not the noble and learned Lord’s Answer relevant virtually only to the case of Asil Nadir? Is it not ridiculous, and a mockery of British justice, that Asil Nadir came back to this country with all the evidence to clear his name, and that the Serious Fraud Office sought to hide behind more than 35 public interest immunity certificates? The SFO used the international status…

Medical Innovation (No. 2): Clause 36 — Duty to Provide Membership Audit Certificate (11 September 2013)

David Anderson: …are getting up to; they are concerned about cronyism. They are concerned about the influence that Murdoch has, and the influence that private people have. They are concerned about people such as Asil Nadir and Michael Brown, who are languishing in jail while the Government parties keep money that they stole.

Oral Answers to Questions — Prime Minister: Engagements (17 July 2013)

Steve Reed: The Prime Minister failed to say last week when he would give back the stolen cash that Asil Nadir gave the Conservative party. When will he give it back?

Oral Answers to Questions — Prime Minister: Engagements (10 July 2013)

Nicholas Dakin: Does the Prime Minister agree with a former Conservative treasurer that the money received from Asil Nadir is tainted and that the Conservatives have a moral duty to give it back? When will he return that money?

Written Answers — House of Lords: Asil Nadir (24 June 2013)

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass: …17 January 2012 (WA 119), and by Lord Wallace of Tankerness on 10 January 2012 (WA 15) and on 24 January 2012 (WA 202), whether they will now answer those questions relating to the prosecution of Asil Nadir; and whether they will place copies of all relevant documents in the Library of the House.

Written Answers — House of Lords: Asil Nadir (18 March 2013)

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass: To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many documents were subject to public interest immunity certificates during the trial of Asil Nadir. To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they intend to apply for public interest immunity certificates for the three boxes of documents relating to the Asil Nadir case recently found by the Serious Fraud Office; and, if so, under what legal mechanism. To ask…

Written Answers — Attorney-General: Asil Nadir (5 March 2013)

Emily Thornberry: To ask the Attorney-General what recent estimate the Serious Fraud Office has made of assets hidden from prosecutors by Asil Nadir.

Written Answers — Justice: Legal Aid Scheme (11 February 2013) See 1 other result from this answer

Sadiq Khan: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 1 February 2012, Official Report, column 702W, on legal aid: Asil Nadir, and the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Walsall South (Valerie Vaz) of 11 December 2012, Official Report, column 207W, on Abu Qatada, whether his Department will provide the total amount of legal aid his Department has spent to date in respect of…

Opposition Day — [15th Allotted Day]: Blacklisting (23 January 2013)

David Anderson: …Let me also put it on record that none of the people who donate money to the Labour party are languishing in jail, unlike people who have funded the two coalition parties, namely Michael Brown and Asil Nadir. The motion ought not to divide the House, but I want to hear from the Minister whether she agrees with the last three lines of it, because that is the “doing” part. Will…

Pauline Read

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Comments are closed.